|
|
|
Written by Janna Herron
|
|
Wednesday, 24 November 2010 11:41 |
Rates on fixed mortgages edged up this week, inching further away from the lowest level in decades.
Freddie Mac said Wednesday the average rate for 30-year fixed loans rose to 4.40 percent from 4.39 percent last week. Two weeks ago, the rate hit 4.17 percent, the lowest level on records dating back to 1971. The 15-year loan also increased, to 3.77 percent from 3.76 percent. It hit its lowest point since the survey began in 1991 two weeks earlier at 3.57 percent.
The yields pulled away from their yearly lows in the last two weeks as strong data eased economic fears and traders dumped bonds they bought ahead of the Federal Reserve's massive Treasury-buying program to boost the economy. Yields have fallen in recent days on worries over Ireland's debt crisis and tensions between North and South Korea.
The low rates did little to spur home sales, though, because would-be homebuyers are too concerned about their jobs or can't qualify for a mortgage. Others can't sell their home before buying another. In a hopeful sign, the Mortgage Bankers Association said Wednesday that applications for mortgages to buy homes rose to the highest level since May last week from the previous week. But new home sales dropped 8.1 percent to a seasonally adjusted annual rate of 283,000 units in October, the Commerce Department said Wednesday. The pace is just 2.9 percent lower than August's rate of 275,000 units, the worst level on records dating back to 1963.
The National Association of Realtors said Tuesday that sales of previously owned homes slipped 2.2 percent last month to a seasonally adjusted annual rate of 4.43 million units. The performance was weaker than had been expected.
To calculate average mortgage rates, Freddie Mac collects rates from lenders across the country on Monday through Wednesday of each week. Rates often fluctuate significantly, even within a single day. Rates on five-year adjustable-rate mortgages averaged 3.45 percent, up from 3.40 percent. The five-year hit 3.25 percent two weeks ago, the lowest rate on records dating back to January 2005.
***taken from http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/38770102/ns/business-us_business/
|
|
Written by Ryan Zook, Cook and Zook Team
|
|
Monday, 13 September 2010 15:11 |
Lawrence Yun, the National Association of Realtors chief economist, wrote an article this month addressing President Obama's proposal to eliminate or amend the mortgage interest tax deductions (MID) for certain tax brackets, a policy which has been around for 17 presidencies. As noted on the NAR website, here is the fundamental issue... "Individuals are permitted to deduct mortgage interest paid on mortgage debt of up to $1 million. The deduction is available for interest on mortgages for a principal residence and one additional residence. The $1 million limitation represents the combined allowable debt on two residences. Mortgage interest on up to $100,000 of debt on home equity loans or lines of credit also qualifies for the deduction. The Administration has proposed limiting the value of the MID for upper income taxpayers by, in effect, converting the deduction to a 28% tax credit for those individuals who are currently in the 33% or 35% tax brackets.
Currently, taxpayers in the 33% and 35% income brackets are able to reduce their taxes through deductions for mortgage interest payments, charitable contributions, local taxes and other expenses by 33 and 35 cents, respectively, on the dollar. Under the Administration’s proposal, these individuals would only be able to reduce their tax bill by only 28 cents on the dollar. The Administration estimates that the change would raise $318 billion over the next 10 years. While NAR has supported and applauds the efforts of the Obama Administration in taking aggressive measures to stabilize both the housing market and the nation’s economy, NAR has aggressively expressed its opposition to the Administration MID proposal. NAR believes the proposal is ill-timed and ill-advised. It would have adverse impact on housing values and the pace of economic recovery."
Here is Lawrence Yun's latest post: "We’ve heard increased chatter among opinion makers about the need to eliminate or trim the mortgage interest deduction. The argument goes something like this: Not only would ending the MID create a deep source of money for reducing the U.S. budget deficit, but in the aftermath of the mortgage crisis, the country needs to rethink its favored tax treatment of homeownership.
However, this argument downplays two critical facts. First, home owners already pay 80 to 90 percent of the income tax in our country, and among those who claim the MID, almost two-thirds are middle-income earners. So, when we talk about the beneficiaries of this tax benefit, we’re talking about households who are the pillars of federal income tax revenue. We would now be asking them to shoulder an additional tax burden, and also to brace for a 15 percent drop in home values—that’s how much we can expect values to fall as buyers discount the value of the deduction in their purchase offers.
Second, critics who link the mortgage meltdown to our country’s support for homeownership are ignoring the origins of the crisis: unprecedented laxity in underwriting and faulty ratings by credit rating agencies of the securities backed by those mortgages. Through the terms of 17 presidencies, the MID has brought remarkable stability to the housing market.
Yet, critics fail to recognize why our country has been so supportive of homeownership. Academic studies have demonstrated positive social benefits, including lower juvenile delinquency rates and higher student achievement among children of home owners. Whatever deficit reduction might be realized by taking a carving knife to the MID would come at an intolerably steep price: trillions of dollars in wealth destruction and a new uncertainty in what has long been recognized as a bedrock of our economy."
Lawrence Yun and the NAR are continuing to lobby against the proposal. Here are a few articles which discuss the decisions ahead: Obama's interest in changing homeowner tax deductions worries some -- http://www.tampabay.com/features/homeandgarden/article981488.ece Ax may fall on tax break for mortgages -- http://thehill.com/homenews/administration/101883-axe-may-fall-on-tax-break-for-mortgages
Lastly, I read an interesting article in the Washington Post (click here)
over the weekend discussing the effects of inflation/deflation and the
uncertainty of the mortgage interest tax deductions for homeowners. The
article goes into cap rates and more, but I thought I'd share this with
you because it breaks down the big decisions our government has to make
in the coming months regarding the bush tax cuts as well as discusses
Obama's proposal to eliminate or reduce a homeowner's mortgage interest
deductions. http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2010/09/10/AR2010091000511.html?sid=ST2010091002301
|
|
Written by Brian Cook, Cook and Zook Team
|
|
Thursday, 09 September 2010 07:58 |
|
Homeownership has taken a justifiable beating lately. Housing prices have tumbled and sales are still declining. Markets are glutted with foreclosures from people who borrowed too much or lost a job and were unable to sell. And while your friendly Realtor will happily tell you about the opportunities this strife creates, buying a home for its appreciation possibilities is still an iffy venture, especially if you can’t or won’t give the market time to find its long-term footing.
But if you are looking for a place to live a while—and not a property to flip—buying remains the option that gives you both value and, yes, freedom.
Let’s strip away the big picture for a moment. It’s trendy to blame homeownership for the financial mess we’re in, but that’s like saying that eating leads to obesity. It’s not the act that causes the problem. It’s how poorly you do it—and banks and borrowers engaged in loans they shouldn’t have.
But for most of us, owning a home still makes financial sense. Lost in the pop of the housing bubble is some simple math: If you rent, you write a check and never see that money again. If you buy, and you’re prudent and patient about it, you probably will.
It’s called equity. If you’re paying $1,000 a month in mortgage on a standard 30-year fixed rate loan at, say, 5 percent interest—then $2,700 of those payments goes toward the principal of the loan in the first year. That means if you sell the home, you have to pay the bank $2,700 less than the amount you borrowed. The next year you’ll add $2,900 more to that total, and that annual number will go up each year. Plus, the interest you pay is often tax deductible.
If you rent, not only do you get less value by often paying more per square foot than homeowners, that hypothetical $1,000 each month is gone.
And for those renters who point to the supplementary expenses that come with homeownership, such as property taxes and insurance? If you believe your landlord isn’t passing those expenses on to you, then you probably think the car dealer really did throw in those floor mats for free.
Same thing for those household repair costs renters think they’re avoiding. Not only will you eventually pay in rent for the air conditioner that broke in your apartment, you’re also probably paying for part of the unit that died in one of your landlord’s other properties.
But beyond the repairs you have to do, the value of homeownership comes from the changes you want to make. If your carpet is worn or merely ugly, you don’t need permission to improve the place you live. You don’t have to split the cost for something that’ll raise the value of someone else’s property. You don’t have to worry that the landlord might subsequently cut corners with inferior workers or materials.
If you’re a tinkerer, you might be able to do some of these things yourself, which not only will improve your home’s value but make it a more personal investment. Owning a home, however, does not bring a lifetime sentence of fix-it-ups. If, like me, you’re not such a handyman, you can mow your lawn and call it a weekend. It’s your choice.
And choice is what homeownership brings. You can choose a neighborhood or street where you can put down roots without having to worry about a landlord selling your place or booting you out. You can choose a comfortable monthly payment without worrying that it’ll be bumped up in a year, and then maybe again the next year.
*taken from http://www.houselogic.com/news/articles/Homeownership-its-about-value-freedom-and-mowing/
|
|
Written by John Simek, Cook and Zook Team
|
|
Wednesday, 08 September 2010 00:00 |
Some methods on termite control are for pest control experts to conduct but there are also those that you can do on your own. If you really do not want to be bothered by termite problems, then you should try to prevent the problem. Do it yourself termite protection is your first line of defense.
Clear Your Area of Debris One common sense do it yourself termite protection method is to simply keep your area clean. Debris made of cardboard, wood, paper or any other wood based items should not be stored underneath or near your house. Wooden ladders and wood piles should also not touch the sides of your house. These items may absorb or collect moisture and come into contact with other parts of your house. These wood based products are ideal initial food sources for termites from which the insects may eventually move on to your property.
Check Wooden Parts Keeping wooden structures a few inches above ground would prevent termite infestation. This is a simple do it yourself termite protection pre construction tip. You simply have to eliminate wood to earth contact to reduce your chances of attracting termites. If you really want to have a wooden fence or trellis that touches the soil fully, then make sure that they are erected far from your house’s foundation or main structure. You should also regularly check trellises and fences for signs of termite infestation.
Eliminate Moisture Termites thrive with moisture. You can help reduce the moisture in your soil and on the wood of your house by regularly checking the sources of moisture. Defective gutters; leaking faucets, pipes, air conditioning units; and sprinklers that are too near your house may moisturize the soil and wood enough to promote the survival of termite colonies. Make sure that water and moisture is drained from water containers surrounding your house or from the soil surrounding your house. This may include water from air conditioning units, sinks, dish or clothes washers and driers.
Keep Plants and Trees Away A good and thorough termite protection plan should include the garden and shrubbery. Plants and trees may offer both moisture and food to termites. If you should have plants around your house, then make sure that they are located at a distance from your house and that no branches touch the wooden areas of your house.
Choose Treated Wood Use treated wood for the wooden parts of your home in order prevent termite infestation. Borate treated wood for example can help keep termites from eating up the wood.
Have Inspections Have your home regularly checked by experts in order to make sure that your termite protection method is working and effective. Remember that even if you have been very cautious, termites are particularly stubborn and they may still get around your do it yourself termite protection methods. Actual infestations are also not easy to detect because you may not see actual termites until damage has been done. Let the experts take a look at your house from time to time.
http://termiteidentification.info/homemade-termite-killer
|
|
Written by John Simek, Cook and Zook Team
|
|
Friday, 27 August 2010 11:00 |
|
By now, you have probably heard that mortgage rates are at an all time low! This, in many cases, is very true. Many companies are offering low rates which make it very appealing to home buyers in today's market. According to the Federal Reserve Bank of New York, "Lower interest rates make it easier for people to borrow in order to buy cars and homes. Purchases of homes, in turn, increase the demand for other items, such as furniture and appliances, thus providing an additional boost to the economy. Lower interest rates mean that consumers spend less on interest costs, leaving them with more of their income to spend on goods and services. If the rates that consumers and businesses have to pay to borrow rise too rapidly, however, spending may decline, leading to an economic slowdown." (http://realtytimes.com)
In the 1980s, the interest
rates on a 30-year fixed mortgage were up in the 16% range. Today's
average mortgage interest rate is at about 4.5%. Lets put this in
perspective for you. If you were to borrow $100,000 with a 30 year fixed
rate around 16%, your monthly payment would be around $1,400. Now, if
we were to borrow that same $100,000 at 4.5%, your new monthly payment is
around $580. That's a savings of $820. If you looked at a $250,000 mortgage, the numbers are even more drastic. The low interest rates coupled with the decrease in housing prices and the housing affordability index, provide tremendous buying opportunities out there. |
|
|
|
<< Start < Prev 1 2 3 4 5 6 Next > End >>
|
|